Legal Opinion
(HC) Baker v. Muniz
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 22, 2019No. 2:18-cv-01154Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID L. BAKER, No. 2: 18-cv-1154-KJM-DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MUNIZ, prison warden, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff’s filing styled “Objection to Order,” ECF No. 14, is before the court. The 18 court construes this filing as a motion to reconsider the court’s order adopting the findings and 19 recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing the petition as untimely (ECF No. 12). 20 A motion for reconsideration or relief from a judgment is appropriately brought under 21 either Federal Rule…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- James L. McCoy Administrator of the Electrical Workers Trust Funds, Etc. v. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Ybarra v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Interstate Litho Corp. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- James F. Taylor v. MacE KnappCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989