Legal Opinion
Ryan v. City of Lincoln
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 18, 2019No. 2:18-cv-00096Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD J. RYAN, No. 2:18-cv-00096-KJM-DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CITY OF LINCOLN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On December 6, 2018, the court granted the City of Lincoln’s motion to dismiss 18 without leave to amend, effectively ending Ryan’s suit against the City. See ECF No. 27. Ryan 19 now asks the court to vacate its order by granting leave to amend his complaint, claiming he can 20 allege additional facts that will support the futility exception under the Fifth Amendment’s 21 takings…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Fuller v. M.G. JewelryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Margaret Kinzli Evelyn Goossen Philip Kinzli Ernest Kinzli, Plaintiffs v. City of Santa CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Steven J. Harris v. County of RiversideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Clarke v. Tannin, Inc.United States Circuit Court · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.