Dolph v. Lennon's, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
In regard to the clause which it was claimed in the complaint was omitted from the lease to the effect that Lennon’s, Incorporated, should occupy the premises during the term of the lease exclusively for the conduct of its own business, we should first notice that the trial court found from the testimony, that such clause should not be incorporated in the lease, and the plaintiff being apparently satisfied with the decree did not appeal; therefore, that phase of the matter is out of the case.
A party who has failed to take an appeal cannot, on appeal by the adverse party, insist on a decree…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. Milliken Imprinting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Philpot v. GruningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Johnson v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- J. H. Clark Co. v. RiceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Adams v. SchifferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Manning Lumber Co. v. VogetOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Burgdorfer v. ThielemannOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- L. B. Menefee Lumber Co. v. GambleOregon Supreme Court · 1925
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.