Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
The following facts seem to be free from contradiction. The defendant is the owner of a residential subdivision of the city of Portland, entitled Terwilliger heights, which it was proceeding to- sell through the agency of one N. B. Clarke. The latter established upon the tract a building which the plaintiff described as an “entertainment house,” where, according to her testimony, a Mr. Hinkey lectured “about real estate values in Portland, and the great possibility of advance in price, and especially in that district where they were offering these lots for sale. ’ ’ Incidental to the lecture…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Dolph v. Lennon's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
- McCabe v. KelleherOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Whitney v. BissellOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- James v. WardOregon Supreme Court · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Webb v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Sproul v. FossiOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Burgdorfer v. ThielemannOregon Supreme Court · 1936
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.