Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1931PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The following facts seem to be free from contradiction. The defendant is the owner of a residential subdivision of the city of Portland, entitled Terwilliger heights, which it was proceeding to- sell through the agency of one N. B. Clarke. The latter established upon the tract a building which the plaintiff described as an “entertainment house,” where, according to her testimony, a Mr. Hinkey lectured “about real estate values in Portland, and the great possibility of advance in price, and especially in that district where they were offering these lots for sale. ’ ’ Incidental to the lecture…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Dolph v. Lennon's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. McCabe v. KelleherOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Whitney v. BissellOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. James v. WardOregon Supreme Court · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Webb v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Sproul v. FossiOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Burgdorfer v. ThielemannOregon Supreme Court · 1936

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API