Manning Lumber Co. v. Voget
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.
The proceeding before ns was instituted as an action at law. Plaintiff, Manning Lumber Company, a corporation, filed a complaint in which it sought to recover $11,600 from defendant, F. A. Voget, alleged to be the balance due plaintiff from defendant on a contract of sale of real and personal property.
Defendant, in his amended answer, denies that plaintiff “has performed all conditions precedent required by the said contract to be performed by plaintiff”, and further denies that he is indebted to plaintiff in any sum whatsoever. In his first, further and separate answer he alleges that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dolph v. Lennon's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Howard v. TettelbaumOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- L. B. Menefee Lumber Co. v. GambleOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Archer v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Archer v. . McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Frick v. HoagOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Frontier Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Moyer v. RamseyerOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- General Electric Supply Corp. v. Republic Construction Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Mitchell v. CherneckiOregon Supreme Court · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.