Legal Opinion
Burgdorfer v. Thielemann
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 1936PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
Plaintiff charges that by false representations and a false promise, defendant fraudulently induced him to exchange a note in the principal sum of $2,000, and the mortgage securing it together with two unsecured notes in the respective principal sums of $150 and $173, for lots 3 and 10, block 25, Collins View Tract in Multnomah county, Oregon, upon which there was a mortgage of $500. The mortgage securing the two thousand dollar note was upon approximately 64 acres of real property in Clackamas county, Oregon.
The representations, said by plaintiff to have been made by defendant, were that the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Rice v. . ManleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Dung v. . ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Deyo v. . HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Dawe v. MorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sanchez v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Schleifer v. Worcester North Savings InstitutionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- 2-D's Logging, Inc. v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- General Corporation v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1960
- Dixon Et Ux v. Schoonover Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.