Legal Opinion

Adams v. Schiffer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1887PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Error to District Court of Rio Grande County. Adams, the plaintiff in error, filed his bill of complaint in the court below against Schiffer, Borsch and Stern, praying for an account, and a reconveyance to him of the Aztec lode and the Aztec mill-site, and, in case he should not be entitled to this relief, that the defendants be decreed to pay him certain sums of money. The cause was tried to the court on the bill, answer and evidence, and the bill dismissed.

Read the full summary

Error to District Court of Rio Grande County. Adams, the plaintiff in error, filed his bill of complaint in the court below against Schiffer, Borsch and Stern, praying for an account, and a reconveyance to him of the Aztec lode and the Aztec mill-site, and, in case he should not be entitled to this relief, that the defendants be decreed to pay him certain sums of money. The cause was tried to the court on the bill, answer and evidence, and the bill dismissed. Brom this decree Adams appeals to the supreme court. It appears from the evidence that the plaintiff in error, Adams, on the 21th day…

1Opinion of the CourtElbert, J.

The complainant, Adams, prays for an account, and for a reconveyance of the Aztec mine and Aztec mill-site. We consider first the case made on the pleadings and evidence against the defendant Schiffer. The complainant alleges that he was the owner of the mining property in question; that it was of great value; that the defendant Schiffer knew this, and desired to purchase an interest in it; that the complainant was embarrassed financially, and unable to work the mine advantageously; that the “defendant was possessed of considerable money and property, and claimed to have a considerable…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harmony v. . BinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Spaids v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Ripley v. GelstonNew York Supreme Court · 1812
  5. Scholey v. . MumfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Guthrie & Western Railroad v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Wheeler v. DunnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  3. Pocatello Security Trust Co. v. HenryIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Dolph v. Lennon's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Harris v. CarySupreme Court of Virginia · 1911

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API