Legal Opinion
State v. Sargent
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1940No. 27718PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The appellant was convicted of larceny as defined in Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2601 [P. C. § 8944], subd. (2). He contends on appeal (1) that the information did not charge a crime; and (2) that, in any event, the state’s evidence was not sufficient to prove the allegations of the information. The applicable portions of § 2601 read as follows:
“Larceny. Every person who, with intent to deprive or defraud the owner thereof— . . .
“(2) Shall obtain from the owner or another the possession of or title to any property, real or personal, by color or aid of any order for the payment or delivery of property…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- State v. ParkinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- In re RudebeckWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- People v. BartelsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
3Cited by7 opinions
- Quidley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
- State v. HinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. GeorgeWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. GeorgeWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.