Legal Opinion
Myrtle Beach Pipeline Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 3, 1984No. 26-83CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Judge:
This case comes before the court on motion by Emerson Electric Co. (Emerson), *365third-party defendant, to quash the notice issued to it under RUSCC 14(a)(1) and to dismiss it from this case. Defendant opposes said motion. Plaintiff, Myrtle Beach Pipeline Co., filed no written response to said motion but advised, at oral argument it was neutral as to said motion. Following oral argument, the court concluded that the motion to quash was denied.
As of January 15, 1981, plaintiff and defendant had contracted for the delivery to defendant at the Myrtle Beach Air Force Base (MBAFB)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- South Louisiana Grain Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Bowser, Inc. v. The United States and General Steel Tank Co., Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Carrier Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Christy Corporation v. The United States, and Harco Engineering, a Division of Harbor Boat Building Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- UramUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- RSH Constructors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- The United States v. George S. Rush, D/B/A Rush EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Del-Rio Drilling Programs, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Oak Forest, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Bird v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.