Bird v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
On August 24, 2001, defendant filed Defendant’s Motion for Notice to a Third Party pursuant to RCFC 14(a)(1), requesting issuance of a notice to Arnie Butler & Co. (“Butler”).1 On August 29, 2001, the court granted defendant’s motion as unopposed, and the Clerk of the Court issued a notice to Butler to appear and “assert any claim or interest you may have in the subject matter of the above-entitled suit.” The notice advised Butler that, “[i]f you fail to appear and assert a claim or interest in the subject matter of the suit, your claim or interest therein will forever be…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Martin v. WilksSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Richards v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Colton v. Huntleigh USA Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Uusi, LLC, and Oldnar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Allied Oil & Supply, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.