Legal Opinion

Bird v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 18, 2002No. 01-291CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MILLER, Judge.

On August 24, 2001, defendant filed Defendant’s Motion for Notice to a Third Party pursuant to RCFC 14(a)(1), requesting issuance of a notice to Arnie Butler & Co. (“Butler”).1 On August 29, 2001, the court granted defendant’s motion as unopposed, and the Clerk of the Court issued a notice to Butler to appear and “assert any claim or interest you may have in the subject matter of the above-entitled suit.” The notice advised Butler that, “[i]f you fail to appear and assert a claim or interest in the subject matter of the suit, your claim or interest therein will forever be…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Martin v. WilksSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Richards v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1996

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Colton v. Huntleigh USA Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Uusi, LLC, and Oldnar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  4. 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Allied Oil & Supply, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API