Legal Opinion
Davis v. Gray
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 1, 1994No. 77123PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HODGES, Chief Justice.
This appeal is dismissed because (1) it is sought to be prosecuted from a judgment by default 1 which is unappealable 2 since it was not expressly advanced for review by the trial judge, 3 and (2) the parties failed to respond to this court’s April 21, 1994 order directing them to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed by virtue of 12 O.S. 1991 § 1006(A).
The judgment by default, now tendered for review, disposes of the plaintiffs’ claim against only one of the thirty defendants in this action. When multiple parties or multiple claims are pressed in a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Girardeau A. Spann v. Colonial Village, Inc. Girardeau A. Spann v. Marvin J. GerstinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Professor Harriet Spiegel v. The Trustees of Tufts CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Warren L. Anderson and Ruby Anderson v. Deere & Co., John Deere Co., and John Deere Industrial Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Monarch Asphalt Sales Co., Inc., Applicants for Intervention and v. Wilshire Oil Company of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005