Legal Opinion
Casey v. Casey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 8, 2005No. 99,217Published
1Opinion of the Court
109 P.3d 345 (2005)
2005 OK 13
Max CASEY, Patricia Nichols and Carolyn O'Neal Plaintiffs/Appellees,
v.
Margie CASEY, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 99,217.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
March 8, 2005.
James A. Williamson of Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiffs/Appellees.
Charles J. Brackney of Jay, OK, for Defendant/Appellant.
¶ 0 This quiet title action stems from a dispute over joint tenancy property, in which the surviving spouse of a deceased joint tenant claims a probate homestead interest. The joint tenants, Plaintiffs/Appellees, Max Casey, Patricia Nichols, and Carolyn O'Neal (hereinafter "Joint Tenants") asserted…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Akin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Flanders v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Fulsom v. FulsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Brown v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.