Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Goldburg
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided January 16, 1918No. 4639PublishedCited by 10 opinions
From El Raso County. Original habeas corpus proceeding asking a release from arrest under a city ordinance, charging relator for having failed and refused to furnish a daily report to the chief of police, etc. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
The city of El Paso passed an ordinance, the first section of which reads as follows:
“It shall be the duty of every person, firm or corporation who is engaged in the business of pawnbroker, junk dealer or a dealer in second-hand goods or merchandise in the city of El Paso, Texas, either as a business or as a mere occasional purchaser of the same, to provide a well bound book to be kept at his place of business, in which a record of all transactions had by said person, firm or corporation shall be kept, giving an accurate description of each and every article taken in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- William Hoefling & Son v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Pullman P. C. Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Ex Parte WoodsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Fort Worth v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- El Paso Electric Co. v. CollinsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Murphy v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- El Paso Electric Co. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- City of Lubbock v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.