Legal Opinion

City of Fort Worth v. McDonald

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 1956No. 15743PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASSEY, Chief Justice.

From a temporary injunction against the City of Fort Worth enjoining it from enforcing within its corporate limits an ordinance prohibiting the keeping and displaying of “pinball machines” or “marble boards”, the City appeals.

Affirmed.

The ordinance (No. 3434) was passed on February 22, 1956. Within five days suit was filed. The petitioner for injunctive and declaratory relief was Ben McDonald, an individual whose occupation is that of operating coin machines, including “pinball machines” and “marble boards”. A number of special exceptions were leveled at McDonald’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Crossman v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State v. Ferguson KirbyTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Town of Ascarate v. VillalobosTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Brown Cracker & Candy Co. v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Adams v. AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. MoralesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Eastex Wildlife Conservation Ass'n v. JASPER, ETC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. RCI Entertainment (San Antonio), Inc. D/B/A XTC Cabaret v. City of San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012
  4. Royer v. RitterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Gordon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API