Legal Opinion

Mawhinney v. Jensen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1951No. 7537PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Chief Justice.

This is an action to recover the value of personal property which plaintiff vendees allege was fraudulently removed from the premises between, the time of execution of an earnest money agreement and the final uniform real estate contract for the sale of the hotel. The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiffs’ amended complaint and entered judgment for the defendants. All facts well pleaded are admitted by defendants’ demurrer. Bracklein v. Realty Ins. Co., 95 Utah 490, 80 P. 2d 471. In this opinion, where the parties are referred to in the singular, we mean the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chase v. ChaseSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1897
  2. Lutfy v. R. D. Roper & Sons Motor Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Carpenter v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Stuck v. Delta Land & Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Adamson Et Ux. v. BrockbankUtah Supreme Court · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ong International (U.S.A.) Inc. v. 11th Avenue Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. LA Green Seed Company of Arkansas v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. State Bank of Lehi v. WoolseyUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Papanikolas Bros. Enterprises v. Sugarhouse Shopping Center AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Republic Group, Inc. v. Won-Door Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API