Legal Opinion
Hartford Leasing Corp. v. State
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided December 29, 1994No. 930612-CAPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORME, Associate Presiding Judge:
Plaintiff Hartford Leasing Corporation appeals the trial court’s decision to grant, with prejudice, defendant State of Utah’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Events leading up to the legal dispute at issue here are of little relevance to our decision, and thus we focus on the procedural facts. The State of Utah leased office space in a building located in Moab, Utah, owned by Hartford Leasing. On June 22, 1988, Hartford filed a complaint against the State, alleging breach of the lease agreement after the State quit the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Nielsen v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- State v. CopelandUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- In the Interest of ClintonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Martin-Trigona v. Champion Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Carley Capital Group v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Scott v. MajorsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- Shah v. Glendale Federal BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Fennell v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- Pratt v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
- Cheek v. Clay Bulloch Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.