Legal Opinion
Justheim Petroleum Co. v. Hammond
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 3, 1955No. Nos. 5013, 5014PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
This action has its source in a contract executed by the plaintiff Laurence Hammond and the defendants Justheim Petroleum Company and Clarence I. Just-heim. The first cause of action is for damages caused by an alleged breach of contract by the company and Justheim. The second cause of action is for deceit on the part of the defendants Justheim Petroleum Company, Clarence I. Just-heim, F. F. Hintze, Hugh J. Hintze and J. Darrell Nicodemus. The case was tried to a jury which found for the plaintiffs against only the company on both causes of action. The court upon motion…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Walters v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Perkins v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 1952
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Toney Gomes, Jr. v. Ellen L. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. v. Aspen Skiing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. William F. RayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Stadia Oil & Uranium Co. v. WheelisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Kaylor v. Crown Zellerbach, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.