Legal Opinion

Siskiyou Regional Education Project v. United States Forest Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 7, 2009No. 06-35332, 06-35373, 06-35381PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAEZ, Circuit Judge:

Siskiyou Regional Education Project (“SREP”) and intervenor miners Robert Barton (“Barton”) and Gerald Hobbs (“Hobbs”) appeal the district court’s rulings in favor of the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”) on claims brought in connection with the Forest Service’s interpretation of Mineral Management Standard and Guideline MM-1 (“MM-1”), a mining-related directive contained in the Forest Service’s Northwest Forest Plan (“NFP”).

The NFP provides that Standards and Guidelines do not apply when contrary to existing law or regulation. Although 36 C.F.R. §…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Tayler Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Barnes v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Sierra Forest Legacy v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Jennie McCormack v. Stephen HerzogCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API