Legal Opinion
Tayler Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 26, 2017No. 15-15287PublishedCited by 196 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PRATT, District Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Tayler Bayer appeals from a district court order granting summary judgment on mootness grounds to his former employer, Defendant-Appellee Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. (Neiman Marcus), in a suit alleging interference with the exercise of his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 12203(b). For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I. Factual Background
Neiman Marcus owns and operates a chain of retail department stores that sell luxury goods. From March 2006 to January…
2Cases cited110 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by196 opinions
- Zach Hillesheim v. Holiday Stationstores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- UWM Student Association v. Michael LovellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Joseph Cuviello v. City of VallejoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- San Diego County Credit Union v. CefcuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Carl PetrickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
191 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.