Legal Opinion
Jennie McCormack v. Stephen Herzog
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 29, 2015No. 13-35401PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Stephen Herzog, the Prosecuting Attorney of Bannock County, Idaho, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for partial summary judgment and granting the joint motion for partial summary judgment in favor of appellees Jennie McCormack (“McCormack”) and Dr. Richard Hearn (“Dr. Hearn”).
Before the district court, Jennie McCor-mack claimed that Idaho Code Title 18, Chapters 5 — the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (“PUCPA”) — and 6, which regulate the performance of abortions, violate various provisions of the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Brown v. BuhmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Tayler Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Yonas Fikre v. FbiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- American Diabetes Ass'n v. US Dept. of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.