Legal Opinion

Basak v. Damutz

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 16, 1926PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

There appears to be no dispute as to the essential facts of this case, and no exceptions to the finding are taken. The complaint is in three counts and the relief sought is the cancellation of a certain specified deed from one of the defendants to the other, and the removal of the record from the town clerk’s books at North Branford, and for damages. The case therefore turns upon the construction the law will put upon the established facts.

The first count is clearly not sufficient to furnish the relief sought in the first prayer, as it contains no specific reference to the transfer sought to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Canfield v. GregorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  2. Morgan v. FarrelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  3. Goldberg v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  4. Townsend Savings Bank v. ToddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
  5. Lengyel v. PeregrinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Alaimo v. RoyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Miller v. ApplebySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Puro v. HenrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API