Legal Opinion
Clark v. Drska
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 10, 1983No. (2305)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, J.
This is essentially an action to quiet and settle title. The plaintiffs’ complaint alleges record title and title by adverse possession to certain parcels of land. The defendant pleaded by special defense that the plaintiffs’ record title had been acquired by one ousted of possession, 2 and by counterclaim that he had record title to a certain portion of the realty described in the plaintiffs’ complaint and that the plaintiffs claimed an estate in that portion adverse to his title. 3 The court found for the defendant on the complaint and rendered judgment quieting and settling title in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Dacey v. Connecticut Bar Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Lopinto v. HainesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Roche v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Wadsworth Realty Co. v. SundbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Kavarco v. T. J. E., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- DeVita v. EspositoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- In re Joshua S.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Lord v. MansfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- DeSantis v. Piccadilly Land Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.