Pfeiffer v. Regents of the University of California
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an action to quiet title to a certain piece of land, to enjoin defendant from diverting any water from said land, and to recover damages for past diversion of such water. The action was tried in the court below, without a jury, and judgment went for defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying her motion for a new trial.
The material facts in the case, omitting certain deraignments of title and other matters which need not be recited here, are these:—
1. In 1895, plaintiff became the owner in fee of a certain undivided interest in “ two thousand nine hundred…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gates v. SalmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Stark v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Marshall v. TrumbullSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
3Cited by15 opinions
- Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. SilveiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Directors of Fallbrook Irrigation District v. AbilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- East Shore Co. v. Richmond Belt RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Oberwise v. PoulosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.