East Shore Co. v. Richmond Belt Railway
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The action was for partition of lands. The Richmond Belt Railway had obtained from the East Shore Company, before the action was begun, a deed purporting to convey to it, in severalty and entirety, certain strips or parcels of the common land. The deed stated that the strips were conveyed "as and for a right of way" for a railroad "to have and to hold all and singular the said premises, right and privilege unto" the said grantee "so long as the same shall be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gates v. SalmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Mitchell v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Pfeiffer v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Gates v. SalmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. SilveiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Noble v. BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Thomas Tabor and Agnes F. Tabor v. Teresa C. UlloaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Weller v. ChavarriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Richmond v. DofflemyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.