Marshall v. Trumbull
Supreme Court of Connecticut
The facts of this case are fully stated by the judge who gives the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
Previous to the 10th of March, 1847, the plaintiff was the owner of an' undivided half of a [ *184 J gangway leading *to a lot owned by him in severalty, and to a lot belonging to the heirs of Michael Marshall, the other half of said gangway being owned by said heirs. These lots, with the gangway, had all been common property, and on a division, under a decree of the superior court, the gangway was to be and remained a mutual gangway,' for the joint accommodation of the respective owners of said lots, and was owned by them as tenants in common. On said 10th of March, the plaintiff sold his lot…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Porter v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
- Griswold v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1824
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wilson v. . FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Boggess v. MeredithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
- Crippen v. . MorssNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Barrett v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Hartford & Salisbury Ore Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.