Bradford v. Nagle
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Chief Justice:
The issue presented by this appeal is whether the district court erred in setting aside a Mississippi default judgment for lack of in personam jurisdiction.
Plaintiff, a Mississippi resident, traveled to Salt Lake City, Utah, to find a place to live while he completed a residency program in dentistry. He contacted defendant LaMar Nagle, who showed him a rental unit reportedly owned by his brother, defendant Gary Nagle. Upon his return to Mississippi, plaintiff contacted LaMar Na-gle by telephone and was advised that the unit was no longer available as a rental, but that it…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- James E. Peterson v. Harold Kennedy, Richard A. Berthelsen, and National Football League Players AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Arguello v. Industrial Woodworking MacHine Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc. v. MelvinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
- SII Megadiamond, Inc. v. American Superabrasives Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
- Anderson v. American Society of Plastic & Reconstructive SurgeonsUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- Parry v. Ernst Home Center Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.