Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Nagle

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1988No. 20374PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the district court erred in setting aside a Mississippi default judgment for lack of in personam jurisdiction.

Plaintiff, a Mississippi resident, traveled to Salt Lake City, Utah, to find a place to live while he completed a residency program in dentistry. He contacted defendant LaMar Nagle, who showed him a rental unit reportedly owned by his brother, defendant Gary Nagle. Upon his return to Mississippi, plaintiff contacted LaMar Na-gle by telephone and was advised that the unit was no longer available as a rental, but that it…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. James E. Peterson v. Harold Kennedy, Richard A. Berthelsen, and National Football League Players AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Arguello v. Industrial Woodworking MacHine Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc. v. MelvinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
  3. SII Megadiamond, Inc. v. American Superabrasives Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Anderson v. American Society of Plastic & Reconstructive SurgeonsUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Parry v. Ernst Home Center Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API