Legal Opinion

Anderson v. American Society of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgeons

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1990No. 870421PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Plaintiff Celia Anderson (“Anderson”) appeals the dismissal of her complaint against defendants American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons, Inc. (“ASPRS”), and Dr. Robert Goldwyn (“Goldwyn”) (collectively “defendants”) for lack of personal jurisdiction. The other defendants have not contested jurisdiction. This appeal follows trial court certification of its interlocutory order under rule 54(b) of our rules of civil procedure. We vacate the trial court’s order of dismissal as to both ASPRS and Goldwyn and remand for trial on the merits, with an order to postpone…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Archangel Diamond Corp. v. LukoilSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. Trump v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Brown v. Division of Water Rights of the Department of Natural ResourcesUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Pohl, Inc. of America v. WebelhuthUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Arguello v. Industrial Woodworking MacHine Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API