Legal Opinion
Parry v. Ernst Home Center Corp.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided August 7, 1989No. 860278PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWE, Associate Chief Justice:
Plaintiff Bruce G. Parry and defendant and third-party plaintiff Mansour, Inc., appeal the district court’s dismissal of their complaints against defendants and third-party defendants, Okada Hardware Company, Ltd., and Hirota Tekko K.K., both Japanese entities. The district court held that it lacked personal jurisdiction over the third-party defendants and that Hirota Tekko K.K. had not waived its jurisdictional defense.
In January 1980, plaintiff was injured in Utah while splitting logs with a WECO maul which had been manufactured by Hi-rota Tekko K.K., a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Arguello v. Industrial Woodworking MacHine Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- SII Megadiamond, Inc. v. American Superabrasives Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
- Anderson v. American Society of Plastic & Reconstructive SurgeonsUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- Starways, Inc. v. CurryUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re DES CasesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.