Legal Opinion
Arguello v. Industrial Woodworking MacHine Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 1992No. 910046PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
Paul Arguello appeals from an order dismissing his complaint against Industrial Woodworking Machine Co. (“Industrial") for lack of personal jurisdiction. The issue presented is whether the trial court erred in holding that Industrial, a Texas company, lacked sufficient contacts with Utah to permit assertion of persona] jurisdiction over it. See Utah Code Ann. § 78-27-24. We affirm.
We first note the standard of review. Where a pretrial jurisdictional decision has been made on documentary evidence only, an appeal from that decision presents only legal questions that are…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Soma Medical International v. Standard Chartered BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Pohl, Inc. of America v. WebelhuthUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- SII Megadiamond, Inc. v. American Superabrasives Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
- D.A. v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Phone Directories Co., Inc. v. HendersonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.