Matter of Wofford
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary matter, respondent is charged with engaging in misconduct in violation of various provisions of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement, Rule 413, SCACR (RLDE), and the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR.
FACTS
In relevant part, the formal charges allege as follows:
1. The McKinney Matter
Respondent represented Gerald McKinney in a domestic relations action; Mrs. McKinney was represented by Attorney Douglas N. Truslow. The matter included the sale of jointly owned property, netting approximately $160,740.55, which was placed into respondent’s escrow account…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of MarshallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Matter of ChastainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Matter of EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- In re BoyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- In re MundySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- In Re MurphSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- In Re JacobsenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- In Re BoneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- In Re OkpalaekeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.