Legal Opinion

Matter of Wofford

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 11, 1998No. 24785PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In this disciplinary matter, respondent is charged with engaging in misconduct in violation of various provisions of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement, Rule 413, SCACR (RLDE), and the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR.

FACTS

In relevant part, the formal charges allege as follows:

1. The McKinney Matter

Respondent represented Gerald McKinney in a domestic relations action; Mrs. McKinney was represented by Attorney Douglas N. Truslow. The matter included the sale of jointly owned property, netting approximately $160,740.55, which was placed into respondent’s escrow account…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of MarshallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Matter of ChastainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Matter of EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. In re BoyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. In re MundySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. In Re MurphSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. In Re JacobsenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. In Re BoneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. In Re OkpalaekeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API