Legal Opinion

In re Mundy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 12, 1997No. 24619PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this attorney grievance matter, respondent has admitted the allegations against him and consents to disbarment with *195restitution as a condition of reinstatement. We accept his admission and disbar respondent.

The admitted allegations involve several different matters, discussed separately below.

Drawdy Matter

In March of 1995, Drawdy borrowed $43,500 from Associates Finance Company of Greenwood as a first mortgage on a home. In October of 1996, Drawdy refinanced that loan by borrowing $44,300 from First Union Bank of Greenwood. Respondent closed the loan. Drawdy’s check for $44,300 was…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of WoffordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API