Legal Opinion

In Re Okpalaeke

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 23, 2007No. 26361PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an attorney disciplinary matter. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) brought formal charges against Respondent Cletus K. Okpalaeke based upon several alleged acts of misconduct. The panel of the Commission on Lawyer Conduct (“the Panel”) found that Respondent committed numerous acts of misconduct and recommended that Respondent be disbarred from the practice of law. Neither ODC nor Respondent, who is in default, objected to the Panel’s findings or recommendation. We accept the Panel’s report, and we hereby disbar Respondent from the practice of law.

Factual/Procedural Background

I…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. In the Matter of RushtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Matter of WoffordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re JacobsenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. In Re BoneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. In Re LongtinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. In Re HurseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API