State v. Brown
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
Lamar Sequan Brown appeals his conviction for first-degree burglary, arguing the trial court erred in admitting evidence obtained from a warrantless search of the contents of his code-locked cell phone. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The two victims shared a first-floor condominium in Charleston County. Neither was home during the evening of Thursday, December 22, 2011. Sometime after 10:30 p.m. that night, one of the victims heard a phone ring after he returned to the residence. When he went to investigate, he saw an unfamiliar cell phone on the floor and noticed a window had been…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. K.C.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
- State v. VallesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.