Legal Opinion

State v. Valles

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 2019No. 20180320PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Tufte, Justice.

[¶1] Joseph Franklin Valles appeals from a criminal judgment and an order denying his motion to suppress. Valles conditionally pled guilty, preserving the right to appeal the order denying his motion to suppress. Valles argues his cell phone was searched without a warrant in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The State argues the cell phone was abandoned and therefore no warrant was required to search the phone. We reverse the suppression order and criminal judgment and remand to allow Valles to withdraw his conditional plea of guilty.

I

[¶2] On the evening of April 5, 2018, a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People of Guam v. Joseph Quichocho Taimanglo II (aka Joseph Quichocho Taimanglo; aka Baby Joe; aka Joseph Quintanilla Taimanglo II)Supreme Court of Guam · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API