State v. Moore
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1DissentKonduros, J.
I respectfully dissent and would reverse and remand Moore's case for a new trial. I conclude Officer McGraw's warrantless examination of the SIM card constituted a search that violated Moore's Fourth Amendment rights. As Officer McGraw explained in his testimony, the contents one can find on a SIM card include the stored phone number, call logs, a contact list, and "things of that nature." In this case, Officer McGraw testified he recovered the cell phone number, thirty-four contact entries, and three text messages. The minute Officer McGraw removed the SIM card, he had access to digital…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- United States v. Aaron GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- The State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.