Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Moore

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 30, 2017No. Opinion No. 5512Published

1DissentKonduros, J.

I respectfully dissent and would reverse and remand Moore's case for a new trial. I conclude Officer McGraw's warrantless examination of the SIM card constituted a search that violated Moore's Fourth Amendment rights. As Officer McGraw explained in his testimony, the contents one can find on a SIM card include the stored phone number, call logs, a contact list, and "things of that nature." In this case, Officer McGraw testified he recovered the cell phone number, thirty-four contact entries, and three text messages. The minute Officer McGraw removed the SIM card, he had access to digital…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. United States v. Aaron GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  5. The State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API