State v. K.C.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
The State appeals an order granting K.C.’s motion to suppress. The State argued it did not need to obtain a warrant before searching an abandoned cell phone. We disagree and affirm, concluding that accessing the contents of the password-protected cell phone without a warrant violated the Fourth Amendment.
A Lauderhill police officer initiated a traffic stop of a vehicle that was speeding and driving without its headlights on at night. The vehicle pulled into a shopping plaza and then made an abrupt stop. Two unidentified individuals got out of the vehicle, briefly looked at the officer, and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
- DAVID BARTON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- State v. WorshamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Jerry Wiltz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2020
- Rivera v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.