Sjomeling v. Stuber
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Per curiam
[¶ 1.] Steve-Stuber appeals the denial of a motion to modify-or set aside a protection order. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Stuber and Kathy Sjomeling are originally from Watertown. They began dating in late 1998 and became engaged that December. In February 1999, Sjo-meling broke off the engagement and moved to Sioux Falls. The initial break-up was apparently amicable and the parties continued to maintain a friendship and casual dating relationship for a period of time. However, as time went on, Sjomel-ing noted Stuber’s possessiveness and frustration with their relationship and became convinced…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Knodel v. Kassel TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Hendrickson v. Wagners, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. PollmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mitchell v. MitchellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Ferebee v. HobartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Goeden v. DaumSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Nickles v. NicklesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- March v. ThursbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.