Legal Opinion

Hendrickson v. Wagners, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1999No. NonePublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, Justice

[¶ 1.] Servient landowners brought suit against dominant leaseholders for intentionally draining water onto their land resulting in crop loss. After a trial to the court, the servient landowners were awarded damages for three of the years at issue along with pre-judgment interest. However, the trial court refused to grant the servient landowners an injunction against future drainage. The dominant leaseholders appeal. We affirm. The ser-vient landowners filed a notice of review upon which we reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] James and Farol Hendrickson (Hendricksons) own property in Day…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Gross v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Jasper v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Dacy v. GorsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Thurman v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. St. John v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Magner v. BrinkmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Halls v. WhiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Sjomeling v. StuberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API