Legal Opinion

People v. Tindall

California Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 2000No. S080078PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

102 Cal.Rptr.2d 533 (2000)

24 Cal.4th 767

14 P.3d 207

The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Robert TINDALL, Defendant and Appellant.

No. S080078.

Supreme Court of California.

December 28, 2000.

Barry J. Post, San Pedro, and Edward H. Schulman, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, David P. Druliner, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Carol Wendelin Pollack, Assistant Attorney General, Robert F. Katz, Marc J. Nolan, Pamela C. Hamanaka and Mitchell Keiter, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

CHIN, J.

In this case, we decide the question left open in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Monge v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. YartzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. Leonard CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API