Legal Opinion

People v. Yartz

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2005No. S117964PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

We must decide whether a 1978 conviction based on a nolo contendere, or no contest, plea may serve as a predicate prior conviction in a civil commitment proceeding under the Sexually Violent Predators Act (SVPA or Act). (Welf. & Inst. Code,1 § 6600 et seq.) Before its 1982 amendment, Penal Code section 1016, former subdivision (3), provided that a defendant’s nolo contendere plea “may not be used against the defendant as an admission in any civil suit based upon or growing out of the act upon which the criminal prosecution is based.” (Stats. 1976, ch. 1088, § 1, p. 4931.) The…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Hubbart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. GiordanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Doe v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API