Shelton v. City of Shelton
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
Milk is in universal use as a food. It is peculiarly liable to contamination and adultera tion. Therefore in the interest of public health and safety the regulation of its production, marketing and sale are held to be within the proper exercise of the police power of the State. This the State may effectuate directly by its statute, or it may delegate its regulatory power to an official board or officer, or to a municipality. It may exercise this power directly and completely, or it may delegate it directly or completely to either of these agencies, or it may act in the exercise of this…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Schneiderman v. SesansteinOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- Central Railway & Electric Co.'s AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- State v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Korth v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Lyman v. AdornoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Sage-Allen Co., Inc. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Pacific Coast Dairy v. Police CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.