Legal Opinion

Korth v. City of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1927PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Involved in this decision are two cases commenced against the City of Portland and its officers, seeking to restrain the enforcement of Ordinance No. 48244, relating to furnishing milk for the consumption of the inhabitants of the city. One of these suits was instituted by Paul Korth, the other by J. Georgeson. Both plaintiffs produce milt on dairy farms owned by them outside of and in the neighborhood of Portland but dispose of their products to residents within the city. Each plaintiff contends that the ordinance exacts a license fee from him before he can be allowed to sell milk within the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. McClain v. LockeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  2. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Sterett & Oberle Packing Co. v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State ex rel. Umatilla County v. HawksOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. City of Norfolk v. FlynnSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McIntire v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Shelton v. City of SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. City of Oakland v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State Ex Rel. Pardee v. LatouretteOregon Supreme Court · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API