Legal Opinion
McKell v. Washington Mut., Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 18, 2006No. B176377PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
49 Cal.Rptr.3d 227 (2006)
142 Cal.App.4th 1457
Linda McKELL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. et al., Defendants and Respondents.
No. B176377.
Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One.
September 18, 2006.
Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller, Rudman & Robbins, John J. Stoia, Jr., Timothy G. Blood, Kevin K. Green, and Tami Falkenstein Hennick, San Diego, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Tom Greene, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Albert Norman Shelden, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Ronald A. Reiter, Michele R. Van Gelderen and…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Lozano v. AT & T Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Craigslist, Inc. v. NATUREMARKET, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- In re Wellpoint, Inc. Out-of-Network "UCR" Rates LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Clancy v. Bromley Tea Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.