Legal Opinion

Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co. v. Resur

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1917No. 23,289PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Jay Circuit Court; James J. Moran, Special Judge. Action by George Resur against the Grand'Rapids and Indiana Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtLairy, J.

Appellee recovered a judgment against appellant for damages occasioned by the killing of his horse by one of appellant’s trains at a railway crossing. *564It appears by the pleadings and proof that at the time the horse was killed it was in the possession of a man named Pyle, in whose hands it had been placed by the owner for the purpose of being broken, and that Pyle was driving it with another horse, .both hitched to a farm wagon.

Appellant asserts that Pyle, being in the possession of the horse at the time it was injured, was the owner in such a sense as to require that he should bring the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Baggett v. McCormackMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  4. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AuerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nash v. LangMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Associates Discount Corp. v. GillineauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Reliance Insurance Company v. Al E. & C., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MarkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Lee v. LaytonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API