Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad v. Meyer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1906No. 14,265PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for Dawson county: Bruno O. Hostetler, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Epperson, C.

The plaintiff recovered judgment in the district coyrt for Dawson county for the killing of ten head of cattle. Plaintiff was the owner of part and bailee of part of the cattle in controversy, and also of other cattle, which were, on the morning of the accident, confined in a pasture adjoining the railroad right of way. On July 11, 1903, an unusual wind, rain and hail-storm drove the cattle through the fence onto the defendant’s right of way. Plaintiff alleges that the employees of defendant negligently ran one of its trains upon the cattle, killing seven head owned by plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Atkins v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. M. T. Bank v. . F. M. Nat. BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Jellett v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  4. Chamberlain v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  5. Fallon v. ManningSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Trimble v. City of MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Petrus v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  3. Yrisarri v. CliffordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co. v. ResurIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Petrus v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API