Legal Opinion

Associates Discount Corp. v. Gillineau

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 4, 1948PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

This action of tort for negligently causing damage to an automobile, concerns the right of a conditional vendor to recover from a tortfeasor who has settled in full with the conditional vendee. The case was heard, together with a similar action against one Furbush, upon a statement of agreed facts amounting to a case stated.

The automobile was sold to one Zinner under a conditional sale agreement, of which the plaintiff is the vendor’s *491assignee. Before there was any default under the agreement the automobile was damaged on a public way due to the negligent operation of two other automobiles by…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. New England Box Co. v. C & R Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Howland v. StoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Johnson v. Inhabitants of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Finn v. Western RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Adams v. O'ConnorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. City of Quincy v. Brooks-Skinner, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  2. Simmons v. Cambridge Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  3. Omni-Wave Electronics Corp. v. Marshall IndustriesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
  4. Priority Finishing Corp. v. LAL Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  5. Morris Plan Co. v. Hillcrest Farms Dairy, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API