Legal Opinion

Chamberlain v. West

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 1, 1887PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Henne-pin county, Lochren,. J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This action was brought to recover the value of a diamond scarf-pin, alleged to have been stolen from plaintiff’s room *55while a guest at the West Hotel. It appeared from the evidence that the plaintiff was not the general owner of the pin, but that a year or two previous he had borrowed it from a friend, who, he says, “loaned it to him for ten years.” The plaintiff had a verdict for the full value of the property. The defendant’s contention is' — First, that plaintiff, being a mere gratuitous bailee, had no such interest in the property as would entitle him to recover; and, second, even if he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Russell v. ButterfieldNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Atkins v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Finn v. Western RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. M. T. Bank v. . F. M. Nat. BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Jellett v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rogers v. . Atlantic, Gulf Pacific Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Peru-Van Zandt Implement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. United States v. Atlantic Coast Line R.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1913
  4. Benjamin v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Brown v. ShawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API