French v. Brinkman
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment quieting title to a strip of land in plaintiffs and ordering defendants either to pay damages for destroying a wall that plaintiffs had erected thereon or to restore the wall within a reasonable time.
Facts: Plaintiffs, husband and wife, held title to adjoining lots 52 and 53 in a subdivision tract, most of which they at one time owned. Their house and swimming pool are located on lot 53.
In 1952 they erected a concrete block bathhouse on what they thought was the northwest corner of lot 53 and a con crete block wall, forming two sides of the bathhouse, one…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Laux v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Ernie v. Trinity Lutheran ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- McKevitt v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Pao Ch'en Lee v. GREGORICUCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hess v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Rentenbach Engineering Co., Construction Division v. General Realty Ltd.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
- Hall v. HallIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Brinkmann v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Safwenberg v. MarquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.