Legal Opinion

French v. Brinkman

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1963No. L. A. 27059PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment quieting title to a strip of land in plaintiffs and ordering defendants either to pay damages for destroying a wall that plaintiffs had erected thereon or to restore the wall within a reasonable time.

Facts: Plaintiffs, husband and wife, held title to adjoining lots 52 and 53 in a subdivision tract, most of which they at one time owned. Their house and swimming pool are located on lot 53.

In 1952 they erected a concrete block bathhouse on what they thought was the northwest corner of lot 53 and a con crete block wall, forming two sides of the bathhouse, one…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Laux v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Ernie v. Trinity Lutheran ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. McKevitt v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Pao Ch'en Lee v. GREGORICUCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hess v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Rentenbach Engineering Co., Construction Division v. General Realty Ltd.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  3. Hall v. HallIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Brinkmann v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Safwenberg v. MarquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API