Legal Opinion
Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 22, 1958No. Civ. 9152PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.
Plaintiff and appellant, The Flying Tiger Line, Inc., hereinafter called appellant, began two suits against the State Board of Equalization, hereinafter called respondent, for the recovery of sales and use taxes, interest and penalties paid under protest. The actions were consolidated for trial and both are now before this court on appeal. In one action, in which appellant sought to recover $28,978.86, the court gave partial relief by awarding judgment in the sum of $2,870.63 and respondent has not appealed. Other than that, the trial court denied relief in both actions.
The litigation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Southern Pacific Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Empresa Siderurgica, S. A. v. County of MercedSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- People v. SchwartzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Federal Express Corp. v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Union Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Bank of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Iowa State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Management Services, Inc. v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.