People v. Schwartz
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
In the administration of the Retail Sales Act of 1933 (Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1939 Supp., Act 8493 [since 1943 codified in the Rev. & Tax. Code as the Sales and Use Tax Law, §§ 6601-7176]), the State Board of Equalization levied a jeopardy assessment upon Fred Schwartz and sued to collect it. The principal question presented for decision upon the appeal by the state concerns the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment in favor of Schwartz.
The complaint alleged that from October 1, 1939, to and including June 30, 1942, Schwartz was a copartner with Abe Schwartz. Doing business under…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Rathjen Bros. v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
3Cited by15 opinions
- Loeffler v. Target CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Wallace Berrie & Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Southern California Edison Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Maganini v. QuinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.